<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and The Great Authority Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html</link>
	<description>Conversion Rate Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:07:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: new music leeds</title>
		<link>http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4353</link>
		<dc:creator>new music leeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invesp.com/blog/business/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4353</guid>
		<description>twitter very good online social network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter very good online social network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tnomeralc Web Design Toys</title>
		<link>http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Tnomeralc Web Design Toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invesp.com/blog/business/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>Twitter is such a good site for me. Yes, debate with other people is good. But like Gesun said.. you could be debating with no audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is such a good site for me. Yes, debate with other people is good. But like Gesun said.. you could be debating with no audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gesundheitsportal</title>
		<link>http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>Gesundheitsportal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invesp.com/blog/business/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>The said &quot;affair&quot; not only adds intelligence to the already intelligent debaters. It is also a great way for the &quot;unknowing&quot; people to at least participate. Imagine a debate without an audience...very interesting? Nope. But the totality of the affair is very interesting indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The said &#8220;affair&#8221; not only adds intelligence to the already intelligent debaters. It is also a great way for the &#8220;unknowing&#8221; people to at least participate. Imagine a debate without an audience&#8230;very interesting? Nope. But the totality of the affair is very interesting indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webhost</title>
		<link>http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>webhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invesp.com/blog/business/twitter-and-the-great-authority-debate.html#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>it seems you are distributing good money to your readers! thats great. i want to join, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems you are distributing good money to your readers! thats great. i want to join, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

